Never speak against Sanatana Dharma, Pawan Kalyan tells Udhayanidhi Stalin
Never speak against Sanatana Dharma, Pawan
Kalyan tells Udhayanidhi Stalin
Updated - October 03, 2024 09:20 pm IST
In an open retort to the controversial remarks made by Tamil Nadu's Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, Andhra Pradesh's Deputy Chief Minister K. Pawan Kalyan has issued a sharp response. He firmly cautioned Udhayanidhi Stalin against making statements that demean Sanatana Dharma, an ancient and deeply revered faith in India. Pawan Kalyan's comments come after Udhayanidhi allegedly compared Sanatana Dharma to diseases like coronavirus, malaria, and dengue, calling for its eradication. These remarks caused a significant uproar, triggering outrage among Hindus nationwide.
During a public gathering in Tirupati on October 3, Kalyan emphasized the need to protect Sanatana Dharma, which he claims has faced attacks in recent years. He criticized those who remain silent about such attacks while vocally defending other faiths, labeling this behavior as "pseudo secularism." Kalyan stated, "Attack on Sanatana Dharma has never been condemned," and called for a balanced approach to secularism that respects all beliefs 12.
Kalyan's comments included a call for unity among Hindus to defend their faith and proposed the enactment of a national law to protect Sanatana Dharma. He also mentioned the importance of ensuring purity in temple offerings, particularly in light of recent controversies regarding adulterated ghee used in religious
rituals
The Alleged Comparison and Outrage
The controversy began when Udhayanidhi Stalin allegedly made a comparison between Sanatana Dharma and highly destructive diseases, suggesting that the ancient faith must be "completely eradicated." His comments were perceived as deeply offensive, not only for the comparison but for the very suggestion that a faith that has been practised by millions for millennia should be wiped out. This remark stirred widespread anger, with Hindu groups and political leaders across India demanding an apology. Many viewed it as an attack on the very fabric of India's cultural and spiritual heritage.
Pawan Kalyan's Response at Tirumala
In a swift and strong counter, Pawan Kalyan used the occasion of his 'Varahi Declaration' to address the comments made by Udhayanidhi Stalin. Speaking after offering prayers at the sacred Tirumala temple on October 3, Pawan Kalyan addressed the issue directly. Fluent in Telugu but attempting to speak Tamil for the Tamil audience, Pawan Kalyan aimed his message squarely at Udhayanidhi, ensuring that it reached every corner of Tamil Nadu through the vernacular media.
His message was clear: Never speak against Sanatana Dharma. Pawan Kalyan argued that Sanatana Dharma is far too strong and resilient to be harmed by the instigating remarks of politicians. He stated, "People like you have come and gone, but Sanatana Dharma is here to stay." This assertion echoed across the nation, resonating deeply with millions who follow the faith.
The 'Varahi Declaration'
The setting for Pawan Kalyan's comments was his much-anticipated 'Varahi Declaration,' a political and social statement intended to outline his vision for the future of Andhra Pradesh and India as a whole. While the declaration covered various topics, his remarks on Sanatana Dharma took centre stage. Pawan Kalyan, in his trademark style, used a Telugu poem to express his point. The poem, he explained, highlighted the resilience of a system that has endured countless challenges over thousands of years.
Sanatana Dharma, often referred to as the eternal way of life, has withstood centuries of invasions, internal conflicts, and modern challenges. Pawan Kalyan's poem symbolised this enduring strength, making it clear that mere words or political rhetoric would never be enough to shake the foundation of this ancient faith.
A Message to Udhayanidhi Stalin
Pawan Kalyan did not stop at making a statement in Telugu; he urged his fans and party followers to translate the Telugu poem into Tamil and ensure that Udhayanidhi Stalin received it. This move was seen as an effort to make sure that his message, and the deeper significance of his words, reached Udhayanidhi in his own language. By doing so, Pawan Kalyan was not only responding to the specific comments made by Udhayanidhi but also attempting to foster greater understanding between the political and cultural spheres of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.
Pawan Kalyan’s message was clear—politicians who make "instigating statements" about Sanatana Dharma will not succeed in undermining the faith. He said that despite the attempts by many in history to destroy or diminish Sanatana Dharma, it remains as strong as ever. “Such statements,” he warned, “may stir controversy, but they will never erode the essence of Sanatana Dharma.”
Sanatana Dharma and Political Rhetoric
Sanatana Dharma is often considered more than just a religion—it is a way of life that has guided people in India for thousands of years. Rooted in values like compassion, duty, and the pursuit of knowledge, it has inspired countless movements for social reform, spiritual growth, and cultural development. Pawan Kalyan’s open defence of this faith, in the face of political rhetoric, struck a chord with many across the country.
Udhayanidhi Stalin's comments about the eradication of Sanatana Dharma were seen as an attack on this way of life, which has been practised not just in India but across the world. While some have argued that Udhayanidhi comments were taken out of context or exaggerated for political purposes, the outrage they caused shows just how deeply Sanatana Dharma is woven into the fabric of Indian identity. Pawan Kalyan's response was not just a defence of a religious tradition; it was a defence of the cultural and spiritual heritage of the country.
The Role of Politicians in Religious Debates
This controversy also raises questions about the role of politicians in religious debates. In India, where religion and politics often intersect, comments like those made by Udhayanidhi Stalin can have far-reaching consequences. Pawan Kalyan, while addressing the controversy, emphasised the need for responsible leadership. He criticised the use of religion as a tool for political gain, arguing that such tactics ultimately do more harm than good.
Politicians, Pawan Kalyan suggested, should be careful when making statements about faith, particularly when those statements have the potential to incite division and conflict. Sanatana Dharma, like all spiritual traditions, should be respected, and political leaders should strive to foster unity rather than division.
Conclusion: Sanatana Dharma Will Endure
Pawan Kalyan’s retort to Udhayanidhi Stalin’s remarks was more than just a political statement—it was a reflection of the deep respect that millions of people in India have for Sanatana Dharma. In a country where faith plays a central role in the lives of so many, comments that disparage religious traditions can ignite strong reactions. However, Pawan Kalyan’s message was one of resilience and strength, reminding everyone that despite attempts to undermine or attack it, Sanatana Dharma will endure.
https://youtu.be/Piw2pH6hnEE?si=LWRY36y-4KVzmeIX
In his own words, “People like you have come and gone, but Sanatana Dharma is here to stay.” His remarks serve as a powerful reminder that faith is not something that can be easily eradicated. It is a force that has withstood the test of time, and it will continue to thrive, no matter the political or social climate. As the controversy continues to play out, one thing remains clear: Sanatana Dharma will remain a vital and enduring part of India’s cultural and spiritual landscape for generations to come.



.jpeg)
.png)
Comments
Post a Comment